Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2026
Postoperative pain and wound healing following pediatric oral soft-tissue surgery: A network meta-analysis.
СтатьяNetwork Meta-AnalysisСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kaur Kanwalpreet, Saini Ravinder S, Vyas Rajesh, Alarcón-Sánchez Mario Alberto, Flores-Fraile Javier, Heboyan Artak
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate and prioritize scalpels and energy-based soft-tissue management tools used during pediatric oral surgeries. This was based on postoperative pain levels and wound healing results.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted. This analysis was performed following the PRISMA-NMA guidelines. The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to December 2025. Randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies of pediatric patients undergoing oral soft-tissue surgery were eligible for inclusion. The included interventions were scalpel surgery, diode laser, CO2 laser, Nd:YAG laser, and electrosurgery. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain and wound healing. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Frequentist and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses were performed. Treatment ranking was estimated by reporting the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.
RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in this review. All energy-based modalities produced less postoperative pain than scalpel surgery. The highest ranking probability for reducing pain was observed with electrosurgery (SUCRA 71.2%), followed by Nd: YAG laser (SUCRA 66.8%) and diode laser (SUCRA 56.5%). Scalpel surgery had the lowest probability ranking (19.7%). Diode laser had the highest probability for wound healing (SUCRA 86.6%). This was followed by scalpel surgery (71.8%). Electrosurgery had the lowest ranking probabilities for all wound healing outcomes (SUCRA 5.5%). No significant inconsistency was observed between the direct and indirect comparisons. Publication bias was low for the postoperative pain.
CONCLUSION: Energy-based modalities offer outcome-selective advantages over conventional scalpel surgery for minor oral soft-tissue procedures. The maximum reduction in postoperative pain was achieved using electrosurgery and Nd: YAG laser. Diode lasers offer the best wound-healing results. These results validate an approach to pediatric oral surgery that focuses on individual outcomes using personalized techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted. This analysis was performed following the PRISMA-NMA guidelines. The electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to December 2025. Randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies of pediatric patients undergoing oral soft-tissue surgery were eligible for inclusion. The included interventions were scalpel surgery, diode laser, CO2 laser, Nd:YAG laser, and electrosurgery. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain and wound healing. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Frequentist and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analyses were performed. Treatment ranking was estimated by reporting the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values.
RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in this review. All energy-based modalities produced less postoperative pain than scalpel surgery. The highest ranking probability for reducing pain was observed with electrosurgery (SUCRA 71.2%), followed by Nd: YAG laser (SUCRA 66.8%) and diode laser (SUCRA 56.5%). Scalpel surgery had the lowest probability ranking (19.7%). Diode laser had the highest probability for wound healing (SUCRA 86.6%). This was followed by scalpel surgery (71.8%). Electrosurgery had the lowest ranking probabilities for all wound healing outcomes (SUCRA 5.5%). No significant inconsistency was observed between the direct and indirect comparisons. Publication bias was low for the postoperative pain.
CONCLUSION: Energy-based modalities offer outcome-selective advantages over conventional scalpel surgery for minor oral soft-tissue procedures. The maximum reduction in postoperative pain was achieved using electrosurgery and Nd: YAG laser. Diode lasers offer the best wound-healing results. These results validate an approach to pediatric oral surgery that focuses on individual outcomes using personalized techniques.