International archives of allergy and immunology · 2018
Ara h 1 and Ara h 6 Sensitization Causes Clinical Peanut Allergy in Ara h 2-Negative Individuals.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Magnusdottir Helga, Vidarsdóttir Anna Gudrun, Ludviksson Bjorn Runar, Clausen Michael, Lund Sigrun Helga, Jensen Anders B, Sigurdardottir Sigurveig T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Of the major peanut allergens, sensitivity to Ara h 2 has the highest prediction for clinical allergy. In this study, we evaluated sensitization to peanut components in Iceland and related Ara h 2-negative sensitization to clinical allergy.
METHODS: Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 8, and Bet v 1 IgEs were measured (ImmunoCAP) in 220 peanut IgE (Pn-IgE)-positive serum samples. Ara h 2 IgE-negative individuals were invited to an open peanut challenge and evaluated for Ara h 6 and 9 sensitization (ISAC microarray).
RESULTS: The Ara h 2 IgE-negative group (52.3%, 115/220) was older (p = 0.04) and more likely to have a history of pollen allergy than the Ara h 2-positive group (p < 0.001). Of the Ara h 2-negative participants, 24.3% were already consuming peanuts and 38.3% were unavailable. Of the 43 who underwent an open peanut challenge, 79% were negative, 14% were positive, and 7% were inconclusive. Those who reacted to peanuts had a higher Ara h 1 IgE than that of the tolerant participants, and 3 were positive to Ara h 6 IgE, and 2 of those subjects were monosensitized. Ara h 8 may have caused a positive reaction, while Ara h 9 did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Half of the peanut-sensitized individuals in Iceland were not sensitized to the major allergen Ara h 2. Ara h 1, Ara h 3, and Ara h 6 sensitizations resulted in a positive open peanut challenge and they are therefore clinically important for individuals with a peanut allergy in Iceland.
METHODS: Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 8, and Bet v 1 IgEs were measured (ImmunoCAP) in 220 peanut IgE (Pn-IgE)-positive serum samples. Ara h 2 IgE-negative individuals were invited to an open peanut challenge and evaluated for Ara h 6 and 9 sensitization (ISAC microarray).
RESULTS: The Ara h 2 IgE-negative group (52.3%, 115/220) was older (p = 0.04) and more likely to have a history of pollen allergy than the Ara h 2-positive group (p < 0.001). Of the Ara h 2-negative participants, 24.3% were already consuming peanuts and 38.3% were unavailable. Of the 43 who underwent an open peanut challenge, 79% were negative, 14% were positive, and 7% were inconclusive. Those who reacted to peanuts had a higher Ara h 1 IgE than that of the tolerant participants, and 3 were positive to Ara h 6 IgE, and 2 of those subjects were monosensitized. Ara h 8 may have caused a positive reaction, while Ara h 9 did not.
CONCLUSIONS: Half of the peanut-sensitized individuals in Iceland were not sensitized to the major allergen Ara h 2. Ara h 1, Ara h 3, and Ara h 6 sensitizations resulted in a positive open peanut challenge and they are therefore clinically important for individuals with a peanut allergy in Iceland.