MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s10792-005-5015-3

Медицинская библиотека · International ophthalmology · 2005

Profile of trauma-related residual periorbital deformities in Indian children.

Pushker Neelam, Bajaj Mandeep S, Sharma Vidushi, Balasubramanya R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To describe the profile of periorbital trauma in Indian children less than 10 years of age.

METHODS

Thirty two children with periorbital injuries were evaluated, over a period of 1 year. Demographic features, mechanism and type of injury were noted. Detailed ophthalmic examination and investigations, including X-ray, ultrasonography, and CT scan were done as needed. Patients requiring secondary intervention were followed-up up to 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Among the 32 children seen, 20 (63%) were males, 25 of 32 (78%) were between 4 and 7 years of age. Fall was the cause of injury in 31% (10/32) and assault in 28% (9/32). Medial canthal injury was the commonest of all periorbital injuries manifesting as lacrimal drainage obstruction and telecanthus. Associated fractures of the naso-orbital bones were present in 7 patients (22%) and ocular injuries were seen in 18 patients (56%). Secondary intervention was performed in 20 patients and lacrimal drainage procedure was the commonest surgery, performed in 15 out of 20 (75%).

CONCLUSION

Periorbital injuries in children not only lead to midfacial deformities and lacrimal drainage obstruction but are associated with significant ocular damage also.

Для цитирования: Pushker Neelam, Bajaj Mandeep S, Sharma Vidushi, Balasubramanya R. Profile of trauma-related residual periorbital deformities in Indian children.. International ophthalmology. 2005. DOI: 10.1007/s10792-005-5015-3.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.