DOI 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001902
Glaucoma and brain functional networks: a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Glaucoma is a complex neurodegenerative ocular disorder accompanied by brain functional abnormalities that extend beyond the visual system. However, the causal association between the two remains unclear at present. This study aimed to investigate the potential causal relationships between glaucoma and brain functional networks in order to provide novel insights into the neuropathic mechanism of glaucoma.
METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Based on the genome-wide association studies data of glaucoma and resting-state functional MRI (Rs-fMRI), a bidirectional Mendelian randomisation (MR) analysis was conducted between glaucoma and brain functional networks. Inverse variance weighting was applied as the primary method to estimate causality with false discovery rate correction. Additional sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the robustness of the results.
RESULTS
Forward MR analysis suggested that glaucoma was causally associated with two brain networks between the subcortical cerebellum and the attention or visual network (p=0.022), as well as the default mode and central executive network (p=0.008), but without significance after false discovery rate correction (q>0.1). Reverse MR analysis revealed 19 Rs-fMRI traits related to glaucoma risk, including the salience or central executive network in the frontal region (p=0.0005, q=0.08) and the motor network (p=0.0009, q=0.08) with significant causality.
CONCLUSIONS
This MR study revealed potentially causal relationships between glaucoma and brain functional networks. Especially, the functional connectivity of the motor network between the postcentral or precentral areas may potentially lead to increased risk of glaucoma.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.