DOI 10.1016/s1074-3804(00)80041-9
Accuracy of preoperative diagnostic tools and outcome of hysteroscopic management of menstrual dysfunction.
Аннотация
STUDY
OBJECTIVES
To review diagnoses, complications, and surgical findings in women treated for abnormal uterine bleeding by operative hysteroscopy, and to assess the accuracy of preoperative transvaginal ultrasound (TVS), saline-infusion sonography (SIS), diagnostic hysteroscopy, and endometrial biopsy.
DESIGN
Retrospective study (Canadian task force classification II-2).
SETTING
Tertiary care academic medical center.
PATIENTS: Three hundred seventy-five women. Intervention. Operative hysteroscopy for abnormal uterine bleeding.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
RESULTS
Main indications for hysteroscopy were postmenopausal bleeding (164 patients, 43.7%) and abnormal premenopausal uterine bleeding (211, 56.3%). Main pathology findings were endometrial polyps (172, 45.9%) and submucous myomas (105, 28%). Polyps had histologic abnormalities in 18 patients. Sensitivity of preoperative diagnostic tools for all intrauterine abnormalities and specifically for myomas and polyps was TVS 74% and 39%, SIS 96% and 96%, hysteroscopy 100% and 99%, and Pipelle biopsy 24% and 10%. The complication rate was 1.3%. Postmenopausal women felt significantly more improvement in symptoms (p = 0.02), and were more satisfied (p </=0.001) than premenopausal women. Only 10 women had repeat surgery for the problem.
CONCLUSION
Operative hysteroscopy is a safe outpatient procedure and is associated with high satisfaction in carefully selected patients. Hysteroscopy and SIS are better diagnostic tests for intracavitary abnormalities than TVS and endometrial biopsy.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.