m+Medelevator.RU
← Поиск публикаций
Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2026

The intraoperative carbon footprint of burn surgery: A prospective case-level analysis.

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Goodarzi Mohammad R, Sutcliffe Alexandra, Abdulla Hajar, Muscat Edward, Dhillon Dharminder, Lewis Christopher J

Аннотация

BACKGROUND: Healthcare contributes to approximately 4-5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Burn surgery is particularly resource intensive; however, its environmental impact has not been quantified at the case level. We aimed to evaluate the carbon footprint of burn surgery and identify its key drivers.

METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at a UK regional burns centre by including adult and paediatric burn procedures. Carbon emissions were calculated in kilograms of carbon dioxide equivalent (kg CO₂e) using published life-cycle assessment data and NHS emission factors. Linear and multivariable regression were used to assess the predictors of emissions.

RESULTS: Fifty-two procedures were analysed (in 49 adults and 3 paediatric patients; burn size 0.2-85% TBSA). Mean intraoperative carbon footprint was 158 kg CO₂e per case (range 40-875 kg CO₂e). Emissions increased by 9 kg CO₂e per 1% increase in TBSA (R²=0.75, p<0.001). Consumables accounted for 67% of total emissions, followed by theatre energy (20%) and anaesthesia (13%). Use of advanced single-use adjuncts was associated with higher emissions on univariate analysis. On an average, a single burn operation generated emissions equivalent to approximately 800 miles of petrol vehicle travel.

CONCLUSIONS: Burn surgery is associated with substantial intraoperative carbon emissions that scale primarily with burn size and consumable use. Although burn severity is non-modifiable, targeted measures-including adoption of reusable textiles, optimisation of theatre ventilation, rationalisation of consumables and preferential use of TIVA-offer practical opportunities to reduce environmental impact without compromising care. These data provide a quantitative benchmark for burn surgery and support integration of carbon metrics into routine audit to guide sustainable clinical practice.

Предметные рубрики MeSH