MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.030

Медицинская библиотека · International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2005

Aspiration in children with CHARGE syndrome.

White David R, Giambra Barbara K, Hopkin Robert J, Daines Cori L, Rutter Michael J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

UNLABELLED: Patients with Coloboma, Heart defect, choanal Atresia, Retarded development, Genitorenal and Ear abnormalities (CHARGE) syndrome have been reported to be at high risk for aspiration and swallowing difficulties. Aspiration has been implicated as the most common cause of mortality in these patients. To date, however, aspiration and swallowing disorders in CHARGE patients have not been independently studied.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of aspiration and swallowing dysfunction in children with CHARGE syndrome.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 30 children with CHARGE syndrome was performed.

RESULTS

Eighteen (60%) children had aspiration observed on video swallow study (VSS), flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), and/or had otherwise unexplained bronchiectasis noted on CT scan of the chest. Twenty-four children (80%) had evidence of abnormal swallowing such as laryngeal penetration, dyscoordination, poor bolus mobility, or pooling of secretions.

CONCLUSION

Aspiration and swallowing dysfunction are common in children with CHARGE syndrome. Formal evaluation of swallowing function should be part of the standard otolaryngologic examination for these patients.

Для цитирования: White David R, Giambra Barbara K, Hopkin Robert J, Daines Cori L, Rutter Michael J. Aspiration in children with CHARGE syndrome.. International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology. 2005. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.03.030.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.