MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.12.032

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026

Development of a patient-specific Fontan failure risk calculator using machine learning-a step toward personalized medicine.

Marathe Supreet P, Betts Kim S, Venna Alyssia, Daley Michael, Iyengar Ajay J, Cordina Rachael, Celermajer David, Andrews David, Robertson Terry, Liava'a Matt, Ayer Julian, d'Udekem Yves, Konstantinov Igor E, Venugopal Prem, Alphonso Nelson

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

The Fontan operation is the final step in staged palliation for patients with single-ventricle physiology. It has extended their life expectancy and improved their quality of life. However, long-term complications and Fontan failure remain lifelong concerns. We aimed to use machine learning to develop a patient-specific preoperative Fontan failure risk calculator.

METHODS

Patient data were obtained from the Australia and New Zealand Fontan Registry (ANZFR). The primary composite end point was Fontan failure, defined as any of death, transplant, Fontan takedown or conversion, protein-losing enteropathy, plastic bronchitis, or New York Heart Association class III/IV. To construct the risk calculator, we first used Cox regression with regularization to predict Fontan failure from 54 preoperative predictors in the ANZFR database. A regularization machine learning tool was used to automate variable selection among many predictors. We then manually added clinically relevant predictors. Six predictors (age, ventricular morphology, primary diagnosis, total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage, Fontan type, and moderate or greater atrioventricular valve regurgitation) were ultimately used in a subsequent multivariable Cox regression (without regularization) to ensure the final risk prediction model was simple and easy to interpret.

RESULTS

Data from 1888 patients over 48 years (1975-2023) were available. The ANZFR collects perioperative and follow-up variables about each patient. After excluding patients with Fontan procedures with an atriopulmonary connection (n = 290) and missing predictors or outcome data (n = 125), data from 1473 patients were used to construct the calculator. Median age at Fontan was 4.5 years (interquartile range, 3.7, 5.6 years). Median follow-up was 11.0 years (interquartile range, 5.3, 17.8 years). Freedom from Fontan failure for the overall cohort at 10, 20, and 30 years was 92% (confidence interval [CI], 90%-93%), 83% (CI, 80%-86%), and 72% (CI, 65%-78%), respectively. External validation in an independent cohort demonstrated acceptable model performance. The risk prediction model was then implemented in a Desktop application using the Shiny library in R and used to develop the preoperative Fontan failure calculator on the basis of the 6 predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

Machine learning can be applied to "big data" from a binational Fontan Registry to develop a preoperative, patient-specific Fontan failure risk calculator. The model will continue to learn and improve as more data is added. This is a step toward personalized medicine enabling patient-specific pre-operative counselling and realistic expectations.

Для цитирования: Marathe Supreet P, Betts Kim S, Venna Alyssia, Daley Michael, Iyengar Ajay J, Cordina Rachael, Celermajer David, Andrews David, Robertson Terry, Liava'a Matt, Ayer Julian, d'Udekem Yves, Konstantinov Igor E, Venugopal Prem, Alphonso Nelson. Development of a patient-specific Fontan failure risk calculator using machine learning-a step toward personalized medicine.. The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2025.12.032.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.