MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s003470050197

Медицинская библиотека · Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 1997

[Surgical management of Marfan-associated and idiopathic lens dislocations].

Klüppel M, Sundmacher R, Althaus C

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The ideal and safe surgical method for Marfan-associated or idiopathic lens subluxations is still a matter of debate.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Between 1990 and 1995, 23 eyes were operated for lens subluxations, mainly because of decreased visual acuity, but also because of conservatively uncontrolled secondary glaucoma. Marfan patients were 27.0 (5-62) years old at surgery; patients with idiopathic lens subluxations were 38.5 (11-63) years old. Surgical procedure depended on patient age and anatomical conditions.

RESULTS

All patients achieved an increase in visual acuity. Amblyopia existed in six patients. All problems due to glaucoma were controlled postoperatively. Our greatest concern was rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. It occurred in only one eye of a non-Marfan patient.

CONCLUSION

The prognosis for lens surgery in Martan-associated and idiopathic lens subluxations is good. The implantation of a posterior chamber lens provides a good and secure means of optical rehabilitation. Our preferred primary transscleral suture technique guarantees high security and stability of position. Previously feared surgical risks have been reduced by modern surgical procedures.

Для цитирования: Klüppel M, Sundmacher R, Althaus C. [Surgical management of Marfan-associated and idiopathic lens dislocations].. Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft. 1997. DOI: 10.1007/s003470050197.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.