MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/scs.0000000000001646

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2015

Total Scalp Replantation: Surgical Tricks and Pitfalls.

Nasir Serdar, Karaaltin Mehmet, Erdem Adnan

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Two patients were successfully operated on for total scalp avulsions.

METHODS

Ages were between 11 and 35 years, and both patients were female. Bilateral temporal artery and veins were used as the recipient pedicles. Interpositional vein graft harvested from the left forearm was used in 1 patient. No nerve repair was performed.

RESULTS

The scalp was successfully replanted in both cases. Venous congestion and arterial insufficiency were observed in 1 patient. Successful revision of the vascular anastomosis was performed. Total necrosis of the upper helical rim was observed in 1 patient. A mean size of 3 × 3 cm of tissue necrosis was observed in the occipital region of all patients. One patient was treated with split-thickness skin grafting, whereas the other one was left for secondary healing.

CONCLUSIONS

The "replace like tissue with like tissue" represents the philosophy in replantation surgery. Although reconstructive surgeries imply advanced surgical methods, scalp replantation remains the only ideal surgical modality to create an embellishing natural-looking hair-bearing scalp. In this article, we present some tricks and pitfalls of total avulsed scalp replantation as well as our skills and literature review.

Для цитирования: Nasir Serdar, Karaaltin Mehmet, Erdem Adnan. Total Scalp Replantation: Surgical Tricks and Pitfalls.. The Journal of craniofacial surgery. 2015. DOI: 10.1097/scs.0000000000001646.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.