Brain imaging abnormalities in children with dysphagia with aspiration: A retrospective study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Head imaging is often performed in children with persistent dysphagia with aspiration to evaluate for Chiari malformations that may be associated with dysphagia. Unfortunately, the frequency of Chiari malformations or other head imaging abnormalities in children who aspirate is unknown. The goal of this study is to determine the frequency of head imaging abnormalities in children with evidence of aspiration or penetration on video fluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS).
SETTING
Tertiary Children's Hospital.
METHODS
We performed retrospective analysis of children with a diagnosis of aspiration evaluated at our center from January 2010 through April 2021. In this study, we included children with VFSS confirmed aspiration or penetration, brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at our center, and without known genetic, congenital craniofacial, or neurologic abnormalities.
RESULTS
Of the 977 patients evaluated in our system during that time with a diagnosis of aspiration, 185 children met the inclusion criteria. Eight children were diagnosed with Chiari malformations (4.3%) and 94 head MRIs were abnormal (51.4%). There was no difference in VFSS findings (frequency of aspiration, penetration, penetration-aspiration score, or recommended thickness of liquid) in children with a Chiari malformation versus other abnormalities or normal brain imaging. The majority of other non-Chiari brain imaging abnormalities were nonspecific. There was no difference in VFSS findings in children with abnormal MRI findings versus normal MRI.
CONCLUSIONS
Brain imaging abnormalities are common in children who aspirate. Intervenable lesions are rare. Further studies are required to determine patients that will most likely benefit from brain imaging.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.