MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2011.00520.x

Медицинская библиотека · Congenital heart disease · 2011

Root dilation in patients with truncus arteriosus.

Carlo Waldemar F, McKenzie E Dean, Slesnick Timothy C

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

A dilated aortic root is a common finding in children and adults with some forms of congenital heart defects. No data exist on root dilation in truncus arteriosus. We sought to delineate root dimensions across a population of patients with truncus arteriosus.

DESIGN

We performed a single-center retrospective review of all patients with truncus arteriosus. Demographic information, clinical history, and most recent echocardiographic data were evaluated.

RESULTS

We identified 76 patients whose most recent study was at a median age of 5.4 years (range 0--32.7 years). Mean truncal root z-score was 5.1 ± 2.3. All but three patients had truncal root z-scores greater than or equal to 2. Truncal root z-scores remained stable with increasing body surface area and age. There were no cases of dissection or rupture. Six patients underwent truncal root surgery, typically for indications of root dilation with significant truncal valve insufficiency and left ventricular dilation.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, mean truncal root z-score was 5, and all but three patients had truncal root z-scores greater than or equal to 2. Although repeat surgical intervention was rare and major complications related to root dilation did not occur in our cohort, further studies with longitudinal follow-up into adulthood are needed.

Для цитирования: Carlo Waldemar F, McKenzie E Dean, Slesnick Timothy C. Root dilation in patients with truncus arteriosus.. Congenital heart disease. 2011. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-0803.2011.00520.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.