MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00701-009-0254-0

Медицинская библиотека · Acta neurochirurgica · 2009

Repeated treatment of vestibular schwannomas after gamma knife radiosurgery.

Liscak Roman, Vladyka Vilibald, Urgosik Dusan, Simonova Gabriela, Vymazal Josef

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: When gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) does not achieve control of the growth of a tumour, the need to repeat treatment is considered. The results and risks of repeat treatment of patients with a vestibular schwannoma were reviewed to assess its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2001, we treated 351 patients with a vestibular schwannoma by GKS, control of the growth of the tumour was not achieved in 32. 26 patients underwntrepeat GKS and five patients had an open microsurgical operation and one stereotactic aspiration of a tumour cyst.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 26 patients were followed up after the repeat GKS for a median of 43 months. 15 tumours became smaller, seven remained unchanged and two enlarged. After the second GKS one patient's hearing deteriorated, one developed facial weakness and three facial spasms. One patient required insertion of ventriculo-peritoneal drainage. An operation to radically resect the tumour was performed in five patients after the first GKS and for a subtotal removal in one after repeated GKS.

CONCLUSIONS

In the small proportion of patients (9%) in whom initial GKS does not control the growth of a vestibular schwannoma, most can be controlled by further GKS with a very low risk of a complications.

Для цитирования: Liscak Roman, Vladyka Vilibald, Urgosik Dusan, Simonova Gabriela, Vymazal Josef. Repeated treatment of vestibular schwannomas after gamma knife radiosurgery.. Acta neurochirurgica. 2009. DOI: 10.1007/s00701-009-0254-0.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.