Long-term parental satisfaction with adenotonsillectomy: a population study.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
This study reports the presence of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) symptoms among first graders. We evaluated the severity of symptoms and parental satisfaction in children who had undergone adenotonsillectomy (T&A) compared to children who never had T&A.
METHODS
A population-based, cross-sectional study was conducted. Parent-reported questionnaire data including age, weight, height, BMI, history of T&A, and SDB symptoms (snoring intensity, observed dyspneas, mouth breathing during sleep) were analyzed.
RESULTS
Of 3580 eligible children, 2504 (69.9 %) returned questionnaires. Two hundred fifty-nine (10.3 %) children had a history of T&A. Within this group, 76 % of parents were still satisfied with their child's outcome after surgery. The satisfaction rate decreased from 88.9 % in those who had surgery within 1 year to 71.3 % in those who had surgery ≥3 years prior. The mean values of intensity for all analyzed SDB symptoms on a five-point scale were significantly higher for children who had ever undergone T&A when compared to those who never underwent surgery [e.g., snoring (2.11 vs 1.87; P = 0.0004), dyspneas (1.64 vs 1.22; P < 0.0001), and mouth breathing during sleep (2.95 vs 2.58; P < 0.0001)]. For those who had undergone T&A, 24 % of caregivers were not satisfied with the surgical outcome and the symptom intensity was highest (snoring = 3.16, dyspneas = 2.20, and mouth breathing = 4.23) for these children.
CONCLUSIONS
The mean SDB symptom intensity was significantly higher in children who had undergone T&A when compared to those who had not. The elevated symptom intensity in those children whose caregivers were not satisfied after T&A suggests possible SDB recurrence and need for further evaluation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.