DOI 10.1016/j.jpag.2026.01.003
Fertility Preservation in Transgender Youth from Initial Counseling through Preservation Procedures: A Retrospective Cross-sectional Study.
Аннотация
STUDY
OBJECTIVES
To assess the interest of transgender and nonbinary adolescents and young adults in fertility planning after an initial gender-affirming counseling appointment through completion of a fertility preservation procedure.
METHODS
This was a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients aged 10-24 years seen for initial gender-related medical evaluations at the institution's Pediatric and Adolescent Gender Health Clinic between July 1, 2020, and August 31, 2023. The clinic uses a standardized interview template including questions about fertility goals. Data collected included referrals to reproductive endocrinology and infertility (REI) services, REI appointment attendance, and completion of fertility preservation. Patient demographic characteristics and previous use of gender-affirming mental health or medical services were also assessed.
RESULTS
Among 311 participants, 25 (8%) accepted an REI referral. Referral was positively associated with prior receipt of gender-affirming mental health or medical care. Of the 25 referred, 19 attended an REI appointment, and 8 ultimately underwent fertility preservation. All 8 were assigned male sex at birth and completed sperm cryopreservation. There was no association between previous gender-affirming care and completion of a fertility preservation procedure.
CONCLUSION
Although some transgender and nonbinary patients expressed interest in fertility preservation at their initial visit, only those assigned male sex at birth pursued preservation. This disparity likely reflects the relative simplicity and lower cost of sperm cryopreservation compared with oocyte preservation.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.