Clinical oral implants research · 2008
New safety margins for chin bone harvesting based on the course of the mandibular incisive canal in CT.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pommer Bernhard, Tepper Gabor, Gahleitner André, Zechner Werner, Watzek Georg
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Altered pulp sensitivity of anterior lower teeth is a frequent finding following chin bone harvesting. Persistent loss of tooth sensitivity has been reported in up to 20% of the patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate current recommendations for the location of the harvest zone with respect to the course of the mandibular incisive canal (MIC), the intrabony continuation of the mandibular canal mesial to the mental foramen.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: On computed tomographic (CT) scans of 50 dentate mandibles, the MIC was located and its distance to the root apices, to the labial bony surface, and to the inferior margin of the mandible was assessed. The risk of nerve injury and the percentage of patients suitable for chin bone grafting were calculated.
RESULTS: Respecting current recommendations for chin bone grafting, the content of the MIC was endangered in 57% of the CTs. Therefore, new safety margins are suggested: the chin bone should be harvested at least 8 mm below the tooth apices with a maximum harvest depth of 4 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Applying the new safety recommendations and proper patient selection in chin bone harvesting could reduce the risk of altered postoperative tooth sensitivity due to injury of the mandibular incisive nerve.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: On computed tomographic (CT) scans of 50 dentate mandibles, the MIC was located and its distance to the root apices, to the labial bony surface, and to the inferior margin of the mandible was assessed. The risk of nerve injury and the percentage of patients suitable for chin bone grafting were calculated.
RESULTS: Respecting current recommendations for chin bone grafting, the content of the MIC was endangered in 57% of the CTs. Therefore, new safety margins are suggested: the chin bone should be harvested at least 8 mm below the tooth apices with a maximum harvest depth of 4 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Applying the new safety recommendations and proper patient selection in chin bone harvesting could reduce the risk of altered postoperative tooth sensitivity due to injury of the mandibular incisive nerve.