MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/vsu.13991

Медицинская библиотека · Veterinary surgery : VS · 2023

Caudal pole meniscectomy through an arthroscopic caudomedial portal in dogs: A cadaveric study.

Keider Stefan, Schmierer Philipp A, Pozzi Antonio

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To describe a caudomedial instrumental portal for caudal pole meniscectomy (CPM).

STUDY

DESIGN

Experimental ex-vivo study.

SAMPLE POPULATION: Ten cadaveric hindlimbs of 10 large breed dogs.

METHODS

Each hindlimb was used for establishing the caudomedial portal for CPM. The surgical time was recorded. Specimens were disarticulated afterwards, and the completeness of CPM was documented. Iatrogenic injuries to the articular cartilage and the intra- and periarticular structures were assessed.

RESULTS

The extent of the CPM (mean ± SD, percentage of the resected medial meniscus) was 29.8 ± 12.9% of the area of the medial meniscus. There were no injuries to the medial collateral ligament or caudal cruciate ligament. The mean iatrogenic articular cartilage injury (IACI) was 3.71 ± 1.78% of the area of the medial meniscus.

CONCLUSION

The establishment of a caudomedial portal for CPM in canine cadavers was feasible and allowed to perform a partial caudal pole meniscectomy.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: A caudomedial portal may be considered for CPM in selected cases when caudal tears cannot be accessed through the standard portals.

Для цитирования: Keider Stefan, Schmierer Philipp A, Pozzi Antonio. Caudal pole meniscectomy through an arthroscopic caudomedial portal in dogs: A cadaveric study.. Veterinary surgery : VS. 2023. DOI: 10.1111/vsu.13991.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.