Journal of pediatric surgery · 2016
Congenital choledochal malformation: search for a marker of epithelial instability.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
La Pergola Enrico, Zen Yoh, Davenport Mark
Аннотация
PURPOSE: There is a predisposition to the development of malignancy in congenital choledochal malformation (CCM) although the degree of risk is unknown. We investigated the role of CA19-9 in bile and the MIB-1 (Ki-67) epithelial proliferation index as markers of an at risk choledochal epithelium at the time of definitive surgery.
METHODS: Bile collected at surgery was analyzed for levels of amylase (as a surrogate of pancreatic reflux) and CA19-9. Immunohistochemical staining for CA19-9 and MIB-1 index (expressed as %) was performed on resected specimens. Data are quoted as median (IQR) and differences assessed using non-parametric statistics. A P value of 0.05 was regarded as significant.
RESULTS: Our study group consisted of 78 children with CCM (Type 1 fusiform, n=34; Type 1 cystic, n=30 and Type 4, n=14). Median bile CA19-9 was 159,400 (6-1×10(6)) kU/L. There was no correlation with bile amylase (P=0.49) or biliary pressure (P=0.17) but modest correlation with bilirubin (rs=0.24; P=0.02). In contrast, bile amylase was correlated with plasma γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (P=0.02), alkaline phosphatase (P=0.05) and aspartate aminotransferase (P=0.02); and inversely correlated with biliary pressure (rs=-0.38; P<0.0008). Epithelial expression of CA19-9 and MIB-1 was assessed in 43 specimens. CA19-9 was diffusely expressed on all choledochal epithelium. MIB-1 expression was divided into: high expression (>40%) n=3; moderate (20-40%) n=5, low (6-20%) n=7 and very low (≤5%) n=28. There was no correlation with choledochal pressure (P=0.87), CA19-9 (P=0.51) or bile amylase (P=0.55).
CONCLUSION: Biliary CA19-9 levels were grossly (and unexpectedly) raised in choledochal malformation and appear to arise from biliary rather than pancreatic epithelium. MIB-1 confirms that a small proportion (19%) has marked epithelial proliferation but no clinical correlates could be identified.
METHODS: Bile collected at surgery was analyzed for levels of amylase (as a surrogate of pancreatic reflux) and CA19-9. Immunohistochemical staining for CA19-9 and MIB-1 index (expressed as %) was performed on resected specimens. Data are quoted as median (IQR) and differences assessed using non-parametric statistics. A P value of 0.05 was regarded as significant.
RESULTS: Our study group consisted of 78 children with CCM (Type 1 fusiform, n=34; Type 1 cystic, n=30 and Type 4, n=14). Median bile CA19-9 was 159,400 (6-1×10(6)) kU/L. There was no correlation with bile amylase (P=0.49) or biliary pressure (P=0.17) but modest correlation with bilirubin (rs=0.24; P=0.02). In contrast, bile amylase was correlated with plasma γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (P=0.02), alkaline phosphatase (P=0.05) and aspartate aminotransferase (P=0.02); and inversely correlated with biliary pressure (rs=-0.38; P<0.0008). Epithelial expression of CA19-9 and MIB-1 was assessed in 43 specimens. CA19-9 was diffusely expressed on all choledochal epithelium. MIB-1 expression was divided into: high expression (>40%) n=3; moderate (20-40%) n=5, low (6-20%) n=7 and very low (≤5%) n=28. There was no correlation with choledochal pressure (P=0.87), CA19-9 (P=0.51) or bile amylase (P=0.55).
CONCLUSION: Biliary CA19-9 levels were grossly (and unexpectedly) raised in choledochal malformation and appear to arise from biliary rather than pancreatic epithelium. MIB-1 confirms that a small proportion (19%) has marked epithelial proliferation but no clinical correlates could be identified.