MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99071.x

Медицинская библиотека · Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2000

Review of closed dressings after laser resurfacing.

Newman J P, Fitzgerald P, Koch R J

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Laser skin resurfacing has become an accepted technique for the treatment of facial rhytides and associated solar skin damage. Achieving a successful result is directly related to proper postoperative wound care during the reepithelialization process. There are open and closed approaches to the treatment of the post-laser resurfacing patient with distinct advantages and disadvantages.

OBJECTIVE

To review the most commonly used closed dressings after facial laser skin resurfacing and compare their advantages and disadvantages. To compare clinical findings with a group of patients treated exclusively with an open technique.

METHODS

Review of composite foams, polymer film, polymer mesh, and hydrogel products and prospective observations of clinical outcomes of patients treated with each dressing category after facial laser skin resurfacing. We perform a retrospective chart review of a group of patients treated exclusively with an open technique comparing crust formation, comfort, and pruritus with the prospective group of patients treated with closed dressings.

RESULTS

The closed dressings available today each have unique structural configurations and adhesive properties intended to maintain an occlusive wound environment. Patient acceptance of these dressings was favorable, with improved comfort compared to the open dressing group. Complications of bacterial infections and contact dermatitis were not observed when closed dressings were used with a protocol for dressing changes performed at 48 hours. Rates of reepithelialization did not vary according to dressing category. Crust formation and postoperative pruritus occurred less frequently when closed occlusive dressings were worn by patients.

CONCLUSIONS

When used properly, these dressings improve patient comfort, simplify their postoperative wound care, and do not increase the risk of infection or contact dermatitis. Overall satisfaction was highest with perforated mesh and polymer dressings for full-face wounds.

Для цитирования: Newman J P, Fitzgerald P, Koch R J. Review of closed dressings after laser resurfacing.. Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.]. 2000. DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2000.99071.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.