Does generalized joint hypermobility influence the Ponseti treatment of clubfoot patients?

Previous investigators have suggested a role for generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) in the etiology of clubfoot deformity, while others have suggested its presence may influence treatment outcomes. We sought to determine if GJH was associated with the demographics, treatment, or propensity to relapse of patients whose clubfeet were managed using the Ponseti method. Fifty-seven patients with Ponseti-treated clubfeet comprised the cohort; median age 61 months (range, 38-111 months). A physical therapist evaluated each patient using the nine-point Beighton scale to quantify hypermobility. The scores were then correlated with patient sex, laterality, Dimeglio severity score, treatment, relapse, and surgery. The median Beighton score was 5; 49 of 57 patients (86%) had Beighton scores ≥4. All feet were plantigrade without symptomatic overcorrection at the time of evaluation. Although there was a slightly lower probability of relapse in patients with higher Beighton scores, this was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). Accordingly, the sex, laterality, initial severity, number of pretenotomy casts, need for tenotomy, relapse, and need for tendon transfer surgery were not significantly influenced by the Beighton score. The outcome of Ponseti clubfoot treatment is not altered by the presence of GJH in young children. Joint hypermobility does not appear to influence the likelihood of relapse or surgery. Unlike clubfeet reportedly treated with release surgery, Ponseti-treated clubfeet were not prone to excessive overcorrection regardless of joint laxity. Last, the distribution of Beighton scores in the study's cohort supports an association between GJH and clubfoot deformity.