Annals of plastic surgery · 2021
A New 3-Stage Approach for Reoperative Hypospadias.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jordan Ashley, Sumfest Joel, DeSantis Joseph
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Most hypospadias patients undergo 1 surgical procedure and go on to live normal lives. However, there is a small subset of patients who have remaining functional complications after their repair. Patients presenting with diffuse scarring of the urethral plate and a shortage of penile skin for closure are referred to as "hypospadias cripples." We present our experience using tissue expanders in the treatment of reoperative hypospadias with skin deficiency.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed hospital records from 2009 to 2019. Five hypospadias cripple patients were encountered. A multidisciplinary team involving plastic surgery and pediatric urology collaborated a 3-stage reconstructive plan:Stage 1-Scar excision and buccal mucosal graft harvestStage 2-Dorsal tissue expander placementStage 3-Tissue expander explantation, creation of neourethra, and skin closure.
RESULTS: Successful skin closures were achieved in all patients. There were no cases of expander explanation. Average time between tissue expander placement and final reconstruction ranged from 3 to 4 months. Complications included 2 cases of penile cellulitis, 1 with an associated abscess, and 2 limited urethrocutaneous fistulas, which were addressed with an additional operative procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-stage approach is advantageous in treating hypospadias cripple patients. This population can benefit greatly from tissue expander placement after buccal result with an acceptable complication rate. Using a multidisciplinary approach is beneficial in treating these complex patients.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed hospital records from 2009 to 2019. Five hypospadias cripple patients were encountered. A multidisciplinary team involving plastic surgery and pediatric urology collaborated a 3-stage reconstructive plan:Stage 1-Scar excision and buccal mucosal graft harvestStage 2-Dorsal tissue expander placementStage 3-Tissue expander explantation, creation of neourethra, and skin closure.
RESULTS: Successful skin closures were achieved in all patients. There were no cases of expander explanation. Average time between tissue expander placement and final reconstruction ranged from 3 to 4 months. Complications included 2 cases of penile cellulitis, 1 with an associated abscess, and 2 limited urethrocutaneous fistulas, which were addressed with an additional operative procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: The 3-stage approach is advantageous in treating hypospadias cripple patients. This population can benefit greatly from tissue expander placement after buccal result with an acceptable complication rate. Using a multidisciplinary approach is beneficial in treating these complex patients.