Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation · 2024
Cepstral Analysis of Voice in School-Aged Children.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Deborah Ruth, Samayan Kala
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Dysphonia in school-aged children is attributed primarily to hyperfunctional use of voice. These can be identified through effective protocols using both acoustic and auditory-perceptual analyses.
OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to investigate voice characteristics in school children aged 4-17 years using auditory-perceptual rating and cepstral measures of voice.
STUDY DESIGN: This is a descriptive cross-sectional observational study.
METHOD: Four hundred and fifty-seven recordings of sustained phonation of /a/ in children and adolescents obtained in a quiet room using Zoom h1 voice recorder were analyzed using auditory-perceptual evaluation by three speech-language pathologists using Grade of overall dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain(GRBAS) rating scale. The samples were classified based on age into five groups: 1) 4 to 6; 11 years 2) 7-8; 11 years, 3) 9-11; 11years 4) 12-13; 11years and 5) 14-16; 11 years. PRAAT software was used to extract Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) and Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS). Inter-rater reliability was assessed for both auditory-perceptual and acoustic analysis.
RESULTS: Auditory-perceptual analysis revealed dysphonia in 7.8% of samples with higher rate in males than females. Inter-rater reliability for auditory-perceptual rating was found to be good (Intraclass Corelation Coefficient-0.83). Independent t test revealed statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in both cepstral measures and mean values were lower in dysphonic than normal group. Gender effect was present for CPP in group 5(14-16;11 years) and CPPS in group 4 (12-13; 11 years). One-way analysis of variance within groups in males (P < 0.005) revealed statistical difference in both cepstral measures but not in females. Statistically significant difference was not found between ratings of both speech language pathologists for both CPP (P = 0.929) and CPPS (P = 0.965) values indicating the ratings to be reliable.
CONCLUSION: Pediatric dysphonia has received less attention when compared to adults. Assessing school-aged children for dysphonia using both auditory-perceptual and acoustic measures would aid in identifying those at risk to make appropriate referrals and plan further intervention.
OBJECTIVE: The current study aimed to investigate voice characteristics in school children aged 4-17 years using auditory-perceptual rating and cepstral measures of voice.
STUDY DESIGN: This is a descriptive cross-sectional observational study.
METHOD: Four hundred and fifty-seven recordings of sustained phonation of /a/ in children and adolescents obtained in a quiet room using Zoom h1 voice recorder were analyzed using auditory-perceptual evaluation by three speech-language pathologists using Grade of overall dysphonia, Roughness, Breathiness, Asthenia, and Strain(GRBAS) rating scale. The samples were classified based on age into five groups: 1) 4 to 6; 11 years 2) 7-8; 11 years, 3) 9-11; 11years 4) 12-13; 11years and 5) 14-16; 11 years. PRAAT software was used to extract Cepstral Peak Prominence (CPP) and Cepstral Peak Prominence Smoothed (CPPS). Inter-rater reliability was assessed for both auditory-perceptual and acoustic analysis.
RESULTS: Auditory-perceptual analysis revealed dysphonia in 7.8% of samples with higher rate in males than females. Inter-rater reliability for auditory-perceptual rating was found to be good (Intraclass Corelation Coefficient-0.83). Independent t test revealed statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) in both cepstral measures and mean values were lower in dysphonic than normal group. Gender effect was present for CPP in group 5(14-16;11 years) and CPPS in group 4 (12-13; 11 years). One-way analysis of variance within groups in males (P < 0.005) revealed statistical difference in both cepstral measures but not in females. Statistically significant difference was not found between ratings of both speech language pathologists for both CPP (P = 0.929) and CPPS (P = 0.965) values indicating the ratings to be reliable.
CONCLUSION: Pediatric dysphonia has received less attention when compared to adults. Assessing school-aged children for dysphonia using both auditory-perceptual and acoustic measures would aid in identifying those at risk to make appropriate referrals and plan further intervention.