Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2014
Characterization and improved quantification of left ventricular inflow using streamline visualization with 4DFlow MRI in healthy controls and patients after atrioventricular septal defect correction.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Calkoen Emmeline E, Roest Arno A W, Kroft Lucia J M, van der Geest Rob J, Jongbloed Monique R M, van den Boogaard Pieter J, Blom Nico A, Hazekamp Mark G, de Roos Albert, Westenberg Jos J M
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate trans-left atrioventricular valve (LAVV) blood flow and optimize left ventricular inflow quantification in healthy controls and patients after atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) correction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients after AVSD correction and 25 controls underwent 4DFlow MRI. Using streamline visualization in four- and two-chamber views, inflow direction at early and late filling was defined at the annulus level and at the peak inflow velocity (PIV) level. Trans-LAVV flow volume and velocity were assessed from a static 2D-multiplanar-reformat (MPR), a 4D-MPR tracking LAVV annulus and a 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, angulated perpendicular to the inflow.
RESULTS: In patients, on average 9° more laterally directed inflow was found at the PIV-level compared to controls. In controls, 4DFlow velocity mapping with LAVV annulus tracking resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (3 (1-8) mL) than with static 2D-MPR (7 (4-16) mL, P = 0.001). In patients, 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (2 (1-4) mL) than with 4D-MPR LAVV annulus tracking (6 (2-10) mL, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Streamline visualization of 4DFlow MRI data revealed dynamic trans-LAVV inflow and more lateral flow after AVSD correction. Streamline visualization improved trans-LAVV flow quantification as the positioning and angulation of the measurement plane was optimized, allowing an accurate assessment of left ventricular inflow.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-five patients after AVSD correction and 25 controls underwent 4DFlow MRI. Using streamline visualization in four- and two-chamber views, inflow direction at early and late filling was defined at the annulus level and at the peak inflow velocity (PIV) level. Trans-LAVV flow volume and velocity were assessed from a static 2D-multiplanar-reformat (MPR), a 4D-MPR tracking LAVV annulus and a 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, angulated perpendicular to the inflow.
RESULTS: In patients, on average 9° more laterally directed inflow was found at the PIV-level compared to controls. In controls, 4DFlow velocity mapping with LAVV annulus tracking resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (3 (1-8) mL) than with static 2D-MPR (7 (4-16) mL, P = 0.001). In patients, 4D-MPR tracking the PIV-level, resulted in lower absolute error with aortic flow (2 (1-4) mL) than with 4D-MPR LAVV annulus tracking (6 (2-10) mL, P = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: Streamline visualization of 4DFlow MRI data revealed dynamic trans-LAVV inflow and more lateral flow after AVSD correction. Streamline visualization improved trans-LAVV flow quantification as the positioning and angulation of the measurement plane was optimized, allowing an accurate assessment of left ventricular inflow.