Drugs in R&D · 2025
Drugs for Procedural Sedation and Analgesia in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hamdan Sandrella, Adelou Samuel, Jungo Sébastien, Diakonoff Hadrien, Treluyer Jean-Marc, Fron Chabouis Hélène, Smail-Faugeron Violaine
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Performing medical procedures on children can often be challenging because of the anxiety that these procedures may induce, the need for immobility that they may require, or age-related development capabilities. We assessed the effects of procedural sedation and analgesia drugs for anxiety management in children during medical procedures.
METHODS: We searched PubMed Medline, Cochrane Library, American Academy of Pediatrics, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, and references of eligible studies. We included parallel-arm randomized controlled trials comparing different active drugs of procedural sedation and analgesia in children undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic, painful or nonpainful procedures. Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts, reviewed full-texts, and extracted data related to study characteristics, methodology, participants, and results. Meta-analyses involved the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects approach.
RESULTS: We included 98 studies (9161 children) in the qualitative analysis and 50 in the quantitative analysis. The probability of successful sedation rate was associated with dexmedetomidine versus midazolam alone (odds ratio [OR] 7.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.08-13.48) and with midazolam and ketamine combined versus midazolam alone (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.67-5.39). The probability of successful sedation rate was associated with dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg versus 1 μg/kg (OR 5.21, 95% CI 1.90-14.27).
CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine, and the combination of midazolam and ketamine, seem interesting for sedating children during medical procedures.
METHODS: We searched PubMed Medline, Cochrane Library, American Academy of Pediatrics, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, and references of eligible studies. We included parallel-arm randomized controlled trials comparing different active drugs of procedural sedation and analgesia in children undergoing diagnostic or therapeutic, painful or nonpainful procedures. Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts, reviewed full-texts, and extracted data related to study characteristics, methodology, participants, and results. Meta-analyses involved the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects approach.
RESULTS: We included 98 studies (9161 children) in the qualitative analysis and 50 in the quantitative analysis. The probability of successful sedation rate was associated with dexmedetomidine versus midazolam alone (odds ratio [OR] 7.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.08-13.48) and with midazolam and ketamine combined versus midazolam alone (OR 3.0, 95% CI 1.67-5.39). The probability of successful sedation rate was associated with dexmedetomidine 2 μg/kg versus 1 μg/kg (OR 5.21, 95% CI 1.90-14.27).
CONCLUSIONS: Dexmedetomidine, and the combination of midazolam and ketamine, seem interesting for sedating children during medical procedures.