American journal of otolaryngology · 2023
Long-term efficacy of balloon dilation of the pediatric Eustachian tube: A six-year matched cohort study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gurberg Joshua, Dean Marc, Kawai Kosuke, Toivonen Joonas, Poe Dennis
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Balloon dilation of the Eustachian tube (BDET) has not been evaluated extensively in children outside of retrospective case series. The purpose of this study is to report the long-term safety and efficacy of this procedure in children with matched controls.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a two-center retrospective matched cohort study. Children having undergone tympanostomy tube (TT) placement and adenoidectomy with recurrence of symptoms underwent BDET at an academic affiliated multi-specialty practice. Comparison was made with children receiving TT at a tertiary medical center, matching for number of prior TT, prior adenoidectomy, age, and sex. Outcome measures were risk of failure and the need for additional surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival plots were used to compare risk of failure.
RESULTS: Thirty-three Eustachian tubes were dilated in 20 patients, aged 14 months-14 years. All patients had previously undergone TT insertion and adenoidectomy. Patients undergoing BDET had normal post-operative tympanograms in 80 % of cases. Mean follow up was 6.7 years with 2 patients failing in the BDET group and 8 in the TT insertion group. Dilated patients had a significantly lower risk of failure than those who underwent TT insertion (adjusted HR: 0.18; 95 % CI: 0.04, 0.81; p = 0.03). The probability of being failure free at six years was 88 % (95 % CI: 71, 95 %) in the BDET cohort and 53 % (95 % CI: 33, 70 %) in the TT insertion cohort. There were no complications.
CONCLUSIONS: BDET appears to be safe and possibly superior to TT placement in children with refractory Eustachian tube dysfunction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a two-center retrospective matched cohort study. Children having undergone tympanostomy tube (TT) placement and adenoidectomy with recurrence of symptoms underwent BDET at an academic affiliated multi-specialty practice. Comparison was made with children receiving TT at a tertiary medical center, matching for number of prior TT, prior adenoidectomy, age, and sex. Outcome measures were risk of failure and the need for additional surgery. Kaplan-Meier survival plots were used to compare risk of failure.
RESULTS: Thirty-three Eustachian tubes were dilated in 20 patients, aged 14 months-14 years. All patients had previously undergone TT insertion and adenoidectomy. Patients undergoing BDET had normal post-operative tympanograms in 80 % of cases. Mean follow up was 6.7 years with 2 patients failing in the BDET group and 8 in the TT insertion group. Dilated patients had a significantly lower risk of failure than those who underwent TT insertion (adjusted HR: 0.18; 95 % CI: 0.04, 0.81; p = 0.03). The probability of being failure free at six years was 88 % (95 % CI: 71, 95 %) in the BDET cohort and 53 % (95 % CI: 33, 70 %) in the TT insertion cohort. There were no complications.
CONCLUSIONS: BDET appears to be safe and possibly superior to TT placement in children with refractory Eustachian tube dysfunction.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b.