Neurodevelopmental effects of genetic frontotemporal dementia mutations revealed by total intracranial volume differences.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
So Isis, Bouzigues Arabella, Russell Lucy L, Foster Phoebe H, Ferry-Bolder Eve, van Swieten John C, Jiskoot Lize C, Seelaar Harro, Sanchez-Valle Raquel, Laforce Robert, Graff Caroline, Galimberti Daniela, Vandenberghe Rik, de Mendonça Alexandre, Tiraboschi Pietro, Santana Isabel, Gerhard Alexander, Levin Johannes, Sorbi Sandro, Otto Markus, Pasquier Florence, Ducharme Simon, Butler Chris R, Le Ber Isabelle, Tartaglia Maria Carmela, Masellis Mario, Rowe James B, Synofzik Matthis, Moreno Fermin, Borroni Barbara, Kolander Tyler, Mester Carly, Brushaber Danielle, Kantarci Kejal, Heuer Hilary W, Forsberg Leah K, Rohrer Jonathan D, Boeve Bradley F, Boxer Adam L, Rosen Howard J, Finger Elizabeth C, Frontotemporal Dementia Prevention Initiative (FPI) Investigators
Аннотация
BackgroundConverging evidence hints at neurodevelopmental effects in people at risk of genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD).ObjectiveWe investigated total intracranial volume (TIV), a neuroimaging marker of neurodevelopment, and years of education differences between adult mutation carriers and familial non-mutation carriers, as measures of the structural and functional neurodevelopmental effects of FTD-causing genetic mutations.MethodsThis cross-sectional cohort study, facilitated through the FTD Prevention Initiative (FPI), included 902 adult pathogenic mutation carriers of GRN, MAPT, or C9orf72, and 532 familial non-carriers. ANCOVAs were computed to compare TIV and education between groups per gene. Pearson's correlations were used to examine associations between TIV and education.ResultsMutation carriers (mean ± SD age = 50.0 ± 13.2 years, sex = 55% female, n(GRN) = 298, n(MAPT) = 187, n(C9orf72) = 417) were compared to familial non-carriers (age = 48.0 ± 12.9 years, sex = 58% female, n(GRN) = 201, n(MAPT) = 114), n(C9orf72) = 217). Consistent with prior findings in young adults, GRN carriers showed larger TIV, on average by 20531 mm3, compared to familial non-carriers (95% CI [85.4, 40977], p = 0.049, η2p = 0.008). Larger TIV correlated with higher years of education in GRN carriers (95% CI [0.01, 0.24], r(295) = 0.12, p = 0.03) and GRN non-carriers (95% CI [0.08, 0.34], r(198) = 0.21, p = 0.002). MAPT carriers demonstrated smaller TIV than non-carriers, on average by 29896 mm3 (95% CI [-58248, -1545], p = 0.039, η2p = 0.02). Models with C9orf72 and education as outcome variables did not reveal significant differences.ConclusionsIn support of the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of FTD, GRN and MAPT mutations are linked to structural neurodevelopmental changes in TIV. Further research is needed to identify mechanisms underlying neurodevelopmental influences of FTD mutations and ascertain their suitability as intervention targets.