MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/eja.0000000000002231

Медицинская библиотека · European journal of anaesthesiology · 2025

Ultrasonographic assessment of sugammadex-enhanced early recovery of diaphragmatic function in children: A randomised double-blind controlled trial.

Park Jung-Bin, Kim Tae-Won, Ji Sang-Hwan, Jang Young-Eun, Kim Eun-Hee, Kim Jin-Tae, Kim Hee-Soo, Lee Ji-Hyun

СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In adults, sugammadex promotes faster neuromuscular recovery compared with neostigmine; however, its impact on diaphragmatic recovery and atelectasis in children remains unelucidated.

OBJECTIVES

We compared the effects of sugammadex and neostigmine on restoration of diaphragmatic function and postoperative atelectasis in paediatric patients.

DESIGN

A prospective randomised controlled study.

SETTING

Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

PATIENTS: A total of 73 children aged 2 to 7 years were randomised to receive either sugammadex (2 mg kg -1 , n  = 36) or neostigmine (0.02 mg kg -1 , n  = 37) for neuromuscular blockade reversal when the train-of-four count reached 4 (train-of-four ratio < 0.9).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The diaphragmatic excursion (DE) and thickening fraction (TF) were measured by ultrasound at three timepoints: baseline (T0), before postanaesthesia care unit (PACU) admission (T1) and 30 min after PACU admission (T2). Atelectasis was assessed via lung ultrasonography at T1 and T2. The primary outcome was the diaphragmatic excursion ratio at T1 (DE T1 /DE T0 ), and secondary outcomes included the DE T2 /DE T0 , TF T1 /TF T0 , TF T2 /TF T0 atelectasis score and incidence of significant atelectasis.

RESULTS

At T1, the DE T1 /DE T0 was significantly higher in the sugammadex group (neostigmine vs. sugammadex group, 0.91 ± 0.19 vs. 1.02 ± 0.24; P  = 0.034) as was the TF T1 /TF T0 (0.93 ± 0.39 vs. 1.15 ± 0.49; P  = 0.041). No significant intergroup differences were found in the DE T2 /DE T0 and TF T2 /TF T0 . The atelectasis score and incidence of significant atelectasis were comparable between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to neostigmine, sugammadex accelerates diaphragmatic recovery immediately after extubation; however, this early recovery does not significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative atelectasis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05724550.

Для цитирования: Park Jung-Bin, Kim Tae-Won, Ji Sang-Hwan, Jang Young-Eun, Kim Eun-Hee, Kim Jin-Tae, Kim Hee-Soo, Lee Ji-Hyun. Ultrasonographic assessment of sugammadex-enhanced early recovery of diaphragmatic function in children: A randomised double-blind controlled trial.. European journal of anaesthesiology. 2025. DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000002231.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.