MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0294401

Медицинская библиотека · PloS one · 2024

How warm are political interactions? A new measure of affective fractionalization.

Hudde Ansgar, Horne Will, Adams James, Gidron Noam

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Affective polarization measures account for partisans' feelings towards their own party versus its opponent(s), but not for how likely partisans are to encounter co-partisans versus out-partisans. However, the intensity of out-party dislike and the probability with which this comes into play both determine the social impact of cross-party hostility. We develop an affective fractionalization measure that accounts for both factors, and apply it to longitudinal survey data from 20 Western publics. From this perspective, countries with fewer dominant parties may be more harmonious because partisans have lower probabilities of interacting with political opponents. At the party level, partisans of smaller, more radical parties are particularly troubled because they strongly dislike out-partisans and have few co-partisans. Affective fractionalization has increased in most Western publics over time, primarily because of growing party-system fragmentation.

Для цитирования: Hudde Ansgar, Horne Will, Adams James, Gidron Noam. How warm are political interactions? A new measure of affective fractionalization.. PloS one. 2024. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294401.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.