Diagnostic utility of conventional culture and nucleic acid amplification tests to detect Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pyogenes for the inclusion or exclusion of infection in skin ulcers: An etiologic predictive value analysis.

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic bacteria such as Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) are frequently isolated from skin ulcers. Their presence may signify colonisation, subclinical (covert) infection, or overt clinical infection. While antibiotic therapy is indicated for infection, it is inappropriate for simple colonisation. However, the clinical distinction between these states often lacks a clear-cut demarcation, representing a significant diagnostic challenge.

METHODS

This study utilised Etiologic Predictive Value (EPV) to estimate the probability that the presence of these bacteria represents clinical infection rather than colonisation. Skin swabs from 387 patients presenting to an emergency department were analysed using conventional culture and nucleic acid amplification tests (NAAT). Bacterial growth and detection rates were compared between patients with (n = 70) and without (n = 317) skin ulcers to calculate the EPV.

RESULTS

The positive EPV for bacterial detection yielded wide 95% confidence intervals (CIs), suggesting that these microbiological tests have limited utility for confirming (ruling in) clinical infection. Conversely, the negative EPV was 97-100% with very narrow CIs, indicating that these tests are highly effective for excluding (ruling out) subclinical or overt infection.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that conventional culture and, more notably, NAAT are valuable tools for antimicrobial stewardship. They are particularly useful for excluding infection and preventing unnecessary antibiotic prescription in cases where compelling clinical signs of overt infection are absent.