MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05141.x

Медицинская библиотека · ANZ journal of surgery · 2009

Fijian seasonal scourge of mango tree falls.

Gupta Anuj, Reeves Ben

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Mango tree falls are a frequent presentation at any health facility in the South Pacific. This study aims to identify (i) the number of admissions because of falls from mango trees; (ii) epidemiology; (iii) seasonal trend; (iv) injury profile; and (v) hospital care provided.

METHODS

Retrospective case review on all mango tree falls related injuries resulting in admissions at the Lautoka Hospital, Fiji during a 1-year period (2007). Patient records were analysed to identify specific injury patterns such as upper/lower limb fractures, spinal cord injury and head injury, caused by mango tree falls.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine cases were identified. Eighty-two percent (n = 32) of the falls occurred in the mango season (June-November). Seventy-two percent (n = 28) of the patients were males and 28% (n = 11) were females. Seventy-six percent were aged 5-13 and only 21% were adults. Also, 77% (n = 30) of the patients were ethnic Fijians and 23% (n = 9) were Fijian-Indians. Sixty-four percent (n = 25) had closed fractures and 17% (n = 7) had open fractures. Fifty-six percent (n = 22) of the fractures were of the fore arm. There were two cases of spinal cord injury, four cases of head injury, one ICU admission and one death. Average hospital stay was 7.56 days.

CONCLUSION

All these injuries were recreational and the majority in the urban setting. They were all avoidable.

Для цитирования: Gupta Anuj, Reeves Ben. Fijian seasonal scourge of mango tree falls.. ANZ journal of surgery. 2009. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2009.05141.x.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.