MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38805-5

Медицинская библиотека · The Journal of urology · 1989

Splitting the pubis for exposure in difficult reconstructions for incontinence.

Peters C A, Hendren W H

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

In the last 13 years splitting the pubic symphysis has been used in 46 patients 1 to 32 years old for wide access to the bladder neck and entire urethra in female, or the bladder neck and urethra down into the bulb in male patients. Each patient had a complex problem to reconstruct and most had undergone a prior operation. Underlying pathological conditions included exstrophy in 16 patients, epispadias in 11, cloacal exstrophy in 6, posterior urethral valves in 3, severe trauma in 2, bilateral single ectopic ureters in 2, radical surgery for sarcoma in 2, myelodysplasia in 2, cloacal anomaly in 1 and iatrogenic injury of the urethra in 1. The pubis, or interpubic ligament in exstrophy cases, was divided in the midline. The pubic rami were spread with a laminectomy spreader to create a gap sufficient to operate on that segment of the urethra, which is usually not accessible with an intact pubis. No patient had a problem of nonunion or pubic osteitis after using this approach. This series includes 2 patients undergoing simultaneous iliac osteotomies for a widened symphysis pubis. In no patient was a segment of pubis resected, as has been used in transpubic repair of certain traumatic urethral strictures.

Для цитирования: Peters C A, Hendren W H. Splitting the pubis for exposure in difficult reconstructions for incontinence.. The Journal of urology. 1989. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)38805-5.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.