MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.001

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2021

Kidney Transplant List Status and Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA-CKD Trial.

Herzog Charles A, Simegn Mengistu A, Xu Yifan, Costa Salvatore P, Mathew Roy O, El-Hajjar Mohammad C, Gulati Sanjeev, Maldonado Rafael A, Daugas Eric, Madero Magdelena, Fleg Jerome L, Anthopolos Rebecca, Stone Gregg W, Sidhu Mandeep S, Maron David J, Hochman Judith S, Bangalore Sripal

СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and coronary artery disease frequently undergo preemptive revascularization before kidney transplant listing.

OBJECTIVES

In this post hoc analysis from ISCHEMIA-CKD (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness of Medical and Invasive Approaches-Chronic Kidney Disease), we compared outcomes of patients not listed versus those listed according to management strategy.

METHODS

In the ISCHEMIA-CKD trial (n = 777), 194 patients (25%) with chronic coronary syndromes and at least moderate ischemia were listed for transplant. The primary (all-cause mortality or nonfatal myocardial infarction) and secondary (death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or stroke) outcomes were analyzed using Cox multivariable modeling. Heterogeneity of randomized treatment effect between listed versus not listed groups was assessed.

RESULTS

Compared with those not listed, listed patients were younger (60 years vs 65 years), were less likely to be of Asian race (15% vs 29%), were more likely to be on dialysis (83% vs 44%), had fewer anginal symptoms, and were more likely to have coronary angiography and coronary revascularization irrespective of treatment assignment. Among patients assigned to an invasive strategy versus conservative strategy, the adjusted hazard ratios for the primary outcome were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.54-1.54) and 1.03 (95% CI: 0.78-1.37) for those listed and not listed, respectively (pinteraction= 0.68). Adjusted hazard ratios for secondary outcomes were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.55-1.46) in listed and 1.17 (95% CI: 0.89-1.53) in those not listed (pinteraction = 0.35).

CONCLUSIONS

In ISCHEMIA-CKD, an invasive strategy in kidney transplant candidates did not improve outcomes compared with conservative management. These data do not support routine coronary angiography or revascularization in patients with advanced CKD and chronic coronary syndromes listed for transplant. (ISCHEMIA-Chronic Kidney Disease Trial [ISCHEMIA-CKD]; NCT01985360).

Для цитирования: Herzog Charles A, Simegn Mengistu A, Xu Yifan, Costa Salvatore P, Mathew Roy O, El-Hajjar Mohammad C, Gulati Sanjeev, Maldonado Rafael A, Daugas Eric, Madero Magdelena, Fleg Jerome L, Anthopolos Rebecca, Stone Gregg W, Sidhu Mandeep S, Maron David J, Hochman Judith S, Bangalore Sripal. Kidney Transplant List Status and Outcomes in the ISCHEMIA-CKD Trial.. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.05.001.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.