MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.047

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2022

Antithrombotic Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.

Freeman James V, Higgins Angela Y, Wang Yongfei, Du Chengan, Friedman Daniel J, Daimee Usama A, Minges Karl E, Pereira Lucy, Goldsweig Andrew M, Price Matthew J, Reddy Vivek Y, Gibson Douglas, Doshi Shephal K, Varosy Paul D, Masoudi Frederick A, Curtis Jeptha P

СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Pivotal trials of percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) used specific postprocedure treatment protocols.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate patterns of postprocedure care after LAAO with the Watchman device in clinical practice and compare the risk of adverse events for different discharge antithrombotic strategies.

METHODS

We evaluated patients in the LAAO Registry of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry who underwent LAAO with the Watchman device between 2016 and 2018. We assessed adherence to the full postprocedure trial protocol including standardized follow-up, imaging, and antithrombotic agents and then evaluated the most commonly used antithrombotic strategies and compared the rates and risk of adverse events at 45 days and 6 months by means of multivariable COX frailty regression.

RESULTS

Among 31,994 patients undergoing successful LAAO, only 12.2% received the full postprocedure treatment protocol studied in pivotal trials; the most common protocol deviations were with discharge antithrombotic medications. The most common discharge medication strategies were warfarin and aspirin (36.9%), direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and aspirin (20.8%), warfarin only (13.5%), DOAC only (12.3%), and dual antiplatelet therapy (5.0%). In multivariable Cox frailty regression, the adjusted risk of any adverse event through the 45-day follow-up visit were significantly lower for discharge on warfarin alone (HR: 0.692; 95% CI: 0.569-0.841) and DOAC alone (HR: 0.731; 95% CI: 0.574-0.930) compared with warfarin and aspirin. Warfarin alone retained lower risk at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

In contemporary U.S. practice, practitioners rarely used the full U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved postprocedure treatment protocols studied in pivotal trials of the Watchman device. Discharge after implantation on warfarin or DOAC without concomitant aspirin was associated with lower risk of adverse outcomes.

Для цитирования: Freeman James V, Higgins Angela Y, Wang Yongfei, Du Chengan, Friedman Daniel J, Daimee Usama A, Minges Karl E, Pereira Lucy, Goldsweig Andrew M, Price Matthew J, Reddy Vivek Y, Gibson Douglas, Doshi Shephal K, Varosy Paul D, Masoudi Frederick A, Curtis Jeptha P. Antithrombotic Therapy After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2022. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.02.047.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.