Better is the foe of good: Outcome of operatively treated ankle fractures in the elderly.

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures are the second most common fractures of the lower extremities. Nonetheless, no standardized treatment protocol for unstable ankle fractures of the elderly exists today. Choices to treat ankle fractures are debated controversially, including (1) conservative treatment, (2) open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and (3) primary hind-foot arthrodesis. This retrospective study aimed to examine the healing result in patients treated by ORIF after unstable ankle fractures.

METHODS

The study was designed as a retrospective comparative series. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was followed to assess the postsurgical outcome. Data was obtained from 66 patients younger than 65 (median age, 42 years; range, 18-63) and 28 patients aged 65 or older (median age, 71 years; range, 65-81). The mean follow-up period for the younger-than-65 group was 48 months; for patients older than 65, it was 49 months.

RESULTS

An AOFAS score of 86.4 in the older and 92.4 in the younger group was determined, p-value<0.05. Elderly patients suffered from significantly more open-ankle fractures and comorbidities than the younger group did, p-value<0.05 each. The duration of hospital stay and the time needed to reach sufficient self-mobilization were both significantly different between the two groups, p-value<0.05.

CONCLUSION

ORIF treatment of ankle fractures resulted in good functional assessment after a mean follow-up of 49 months in the elderly. Pre-fracture health condition positively affected the healing results in younger patients. This study confirms the basic AO Foundation principles for good postsurgical results.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative series.