Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2023
Characteristics and health service utilization of children most at risk for prolonged temporary tube feeding.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Syrmis Maryanne, Reilly Claire, Frederiksen Nadine, Bell Kristie L
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to describe children at risk of prolonged temporary tube feeding and evaluate associations between tube feeding duration and child and health service variables.
METHODS: A prospective medical hospital records audit was conducted between November 1, 2018, and November 30, 2019. Children at risk of prolonged temporary tube feeding were identified as having a tube feeding duration of >5 days. Information was collected on patient characteristics (eg, age) and service delivery provision (eg, tube exit plans). Data were collected from the pretube decision-making phase until tube removal (if applicable) or until 4 months after tube insertion.
RESULTS: Descriptively, 211 at-risk children (median, 3.7 years; interquartile range [IQR], 0.4-7.7) differed from 283 not-at-risk children (median age, 0.9 years; IQR, 0.4-1.8) in terms of age, geographical location of residence, and tube exit planning. Medical diagnoses of neoplasms, congenital abnormalities, perinatal problems, and digestive system diseases in the at-risk group were individually associated with longer than average tube feeding duration, as were the primary reasons for tube feeding of nonorganic growth faltering and inadequate oral intake related to neoplasms. Yet, variables independently associated with greater odds of lengthier tube feeding durations were consultations with a dietitian, speech pathologist, or interdisciplinary feeding team.
CONCLUSION: Children at risk of prolonged temporary tube feeding access interdisciplinary management because of their complexity. Identified descriptive differences between at-risk and not-at-risk children may be useful when selecting patients for tube exit planning and developing tube feeding management education programs for health professionals.
METHODS: A prospective medical hospital records audit was conducted between November 1, 2018, and November 30, 2019. Children at risk of prolonged temporary tube feeding were identified as having a tube feeding duration of >5 days. Information was collected on patient characteristics (eg, age) and service delivery provision (eg, tube exit plans). Data were collected from the pretube decision-making phase until tube removal (if applicable) or until 4 months after tube insertion.
RESULTS: Descriptively, 211 at-risk children (median, 3.7 years; interquartile range [IQR], 0.4-7.7) differed from 283 not-at-risk children (median age, 0.9 years; IQR, 0.4-1.8) in terms of age, geographical location of residence, and tube exit planning. Medical diagnoses of neoplasms, congenital abnormalities, perinatal problems, and digestive system diseases in the at-risk group were individually associated with longer than average tube feeding duration, as were the primary reasons for tube feeding of nonorganic growth faltering and inadequate oral intake related to neoplasms. Yet, variables independently associated with greater odds of lengthier tube feeding durations were consultations with a dietitian, speech pathologist, or interdisciplinary feeding team.
CONCLUSION: Children at risk of prolonged temporary tube feeding access interdisciplinary management because of their complexity. Identified descriptive differences between at-risk and not-at-risk children may be useful when selecting patients for tube exit planning and developing tube feeding management education programs for health professionals.