DOI 10.1016/j.ajic.2026.06.005
Impact of a clinical pathway-based antimicrobial stewardship program on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric surgery: An uncontrolled pre-post quasi-experimental study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Pediatric surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is often inappropriate and contributes to avoidable antimicrobial exposure. We evaluated whether a clinical pathway-based antimicrobial stewardship program improved pediatric SAP appropriateness.
METHODS
In this single-center uncontrolled pre-post quasi-experimental study in a tertiary pediatric hospital in Tehran, Iran, clean or clean-contaminated procedures were screened before and after implementation. Overall appropriate SAP was assessed among all eligible surgeries (714 pre-intervention; 658 post-intervention). Compliance was analyzed in indicated-and-administered procedures (n = 447 per period). The intervention combined pathway-based education, dosing aids, stocking first-line agents, and pharmacist feedback. The primary outcome was composite compliance with 6 guideline-defined elements.
RESULTS
Overall appropriate SAP increased from 58.7% (419/714) to 74.2% (488/658; +15.5 percentage points; 95% CI 10.6-20.4; P < .001). Among indicated-and-administered cases, composite compliance increased from 74.9% to 85.0%, and complete compliance from 52.6% to 71.4% (both P < .001). Cefazolin-based regimens increased, while median doses of broader-spectrum agents declined.
DISCUSSION: Findings suggest improved SAP processes and reduced exposure, but inference is limited by the nonrandomized, single-center design and short follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS
The program was associated with better SAP performance and greater narrow-spectrum prophylaxis use. Multicenter studies with longer follow-up should assess sustainability and clinical outcomes.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.