Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography in Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy: Clinical Features and Phenotype-Genotype Correlation.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate the microstructure of the fovea in patients with familial exudative vitreoretinopathy (FEVR) compared to healthy controls using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).
METHODS
In this consecutive, cross-sectional, observational case series, 41 eyes of 41 patients diagnosed as FEVR and 37 eyes in 37 control subjects were studied. OCTA was utilized to automatically measure the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and the vessel density (VD). Inner retinal thicknesses (IRT) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were measured with the instrument caliper. Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed, and phenotype-genotype association was analyzed.
RESULTS
Small FAZ was found in 31.70% (13/41) FEVR eyes but not in controls. Greater CRT and lower superficial foveal VD were noted in FEVR patients. FAZ is negatively correlated with IRT. Persistence of the inner retinal layer (IRL) in fovea was present in 48.78% (20/41) FEVR eyes but not found in controls. Zero percent (0/10) of patients with the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 (LRP5) mutation, 50% (1/2) with the frizzled-4 (FZD4) mutation, and 66.67% (3/4) with the tetraspanin-12 (TSPAN12) mutation had preserved foveal IRL and small FAZ.
CONCLUSIONS
Our data indicate FEVR status is associated with a significantly smaller FAZ, decreased vascular density in both the superficial and deep layers of parafoveal area, a thicker fovea, and an abnormally preserved IRL in fovea. In addition, patients with the LRP5 mutation had a milder phenotype than those with the FDZ4 or TSPAN12 mutations. These novel findings could provide insight into the understanding of the pathogenesis of FEVR.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.