MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.crad.2011.03.007

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical radiology · 2011

Cardiac magnetic resonance: impact on diagnosis and management of patients with congenital cardiovascular disease.

Secchi F, Di Leo G, Papini G D E, Nardella V G, Negura D, Carminati M, Sardanelli F

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To estimate the clinical impact of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in patients with congenital cardiovascular disease (CCD).

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Since 2003, 1.5T CMR was used at our university hospital to evaluate morphology, cardiac kinetics, aortic and pulmonary flow, and vascular anatomy in patients with CCD. The present study considered a consecutive series of these patients from 2003 to 2006. A paediatric cardiologist judged our reports as expected or unexpected and, secondarily, as not reliable (level 0), describing findings already known (level 1), not changing therapy/suggested lifestyle (level 2), changing therapy/suggested lifestyle (level 3) or changing diagnosis (level 4).

RESULTS

CMR reports were judged to be expected in 187/214 (87%) and unexpected in 27/214 (13%). Less than 2% of CMRs were judged as levels 0 or 1, 66% as level 2, and 5% as level 4. During 2005-2006 the clinical impact improved toward higher impact levels (p<0.001, chi-square test).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CCD, more than one in 10 CMR reports were unexpected to cardiologists and over seven in 10 prompted a change of diagnosis or therapy.

Для цитирования: Secchi F, Di Leo G, Papini G D E, Nardella V G, Negura D, Carminati M, Sardanelli F. Cardiac magnetic resonance: impact on diagnosis and management of patients with congenital cardiovascular disease.. Clinical radiology. 2011. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2011.03.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.