MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1055/s-0041-1739503

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery · 2021

Association between Brachycephaly, Chiari Malformation, and Basilar Invagination.

Botelho Ricardo Vieira, Botelho Pedro Bittencourt, Hernandez Bruna, Sales Mauricio Bezerra, Rotta José Marcus

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that Chiari malformation (CM) and basilar invagination (BI) are largely due to disproportion between the content and volume of the posterior fossa. A recent study identified an increased association between brachycephaly and BI. In several types of craniosynostosis, the posterior fossa volume is smaller than normal, and this is more pronounced in coronal synostosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate the association between CM and BI.

METHODS

The cephalic index (CI) measured on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from a sample of patients with craniocervical malformation was compared with that of normal subjects.

RESULTS

The average CI in the craniovertebral junction malformation (CVJM) group was significantly higher in BI patients than in normal subjects. The BI patients also had the highest CI among the whole sample of patients (p = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, BI patients had the highest CI among patients with CVJM and a significantly higher CI than those in the control group. Our data confirm the association between BI and brachycephaly.

Для цитирования: Botelho Ricardo Vieira, Botelho Pedro Bittencourt, Hernandez Bruna, Sales Mauricio Bezerra, Rotta José Marcus. Association between Brachycephaly, Chiari Malformation, and Basilar Invagination.. Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery. 2021. DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1739503.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.