MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/00007435-199904000-00003

Медицинская библиотека · Sexually transmitted diseases · 1999

Usefulness of partner notification for syphilis control.

Kohl K S, Farley T A, Ewell J, Scioneaux J

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

In the United States, the recent syphilis epidemic has been followed by the lowest rates in 40 years. Syphilis control in the United States traditionally emphasizes partner notification; however, its role in elimination efforts remains undefined.

GOAL OF THE STUDY: To describe and compare outcome measures of partner notification during and after the epidemic.

STUDY

DESIGN

Descriptive analysis of data obtained from interview records of patients with early syphilis in Louisiana during 1993 through 1996.

RESULTS

Of 12,927 patients with early syphilis, 3,245 (25%) were identified through partner notification. A total of 7,120 (55%) patients named at least one infected contact. Patients named a mean of 2.3 contacts, resulting in 29,248 named contacts; of these, 22,825 (78%) were examined. A total of 9,374 (41%) of examined contacts were infected, including 18% who were newly identified as infected. No substantial differences were found between epidemic and postepidemic years.

CONCLUSION

Partner notification is successful in identifying and treating a large number of infected persons. However, complementary strategies will be needed to eliminate syphilis.

Для цитирования: Kohl K S, Farley T A, Ewell J, Scioneaux J. Usefulness of partner notification for syphilis control.. Sexually transmitted diseases. 1999. DOI: 10.1097/00007435-199904000-00003.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.