Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery · 2017
Simulation-guided navigation for vector control in pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Badiali Giovanni, Cutolo Fabrizio, Roncari Andrea, Marchetti Claudio, Bianchi Alberto
Аннотация
AIM: Navigation technology has given surgeons the capacity to know precisely where their instruments are during surgery, and simulation-guided navigation is a surgical method which is based on the use of navigation technology linked to 3D virtual surgery simulation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the absolute accuracy of simulation-guided navigation as an aid to reproduce the planned position of the distraction device vector in pediatric mandibular distraction osteogenesis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated seven patients affected by unilateral (3 pts.) or bilateral (4 pts.) mandibular hypoplasia and treated with this method between 2012 and 2014 at the Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of the University of Bologna, Italy. All patients were enrolled for mandibular distraction using internal unidirectional devices (11 distraction devices implanted overall). Patients were studied through a complete three-dimensional workflow, which led to obtaining a virtual reconstruction of the facial bones and the simulation of the distraction device positioning using a specific experimental software. The surgical planning was loaded on the navigation system and the distraction device was placed following the virtual plan, which is displayed on the navigation system as a guide and tracked with the navigation instruments.
RESULTS: We analyzed the outcome comparing the recorded three-dimensional coordinates of the achieved distractor position and the three-dimensional coordinates of the planned distractor position. Among the eleven placed distractors, we found a mean angular error of 3.74° ± 3.30° on the axial axis (yaw) and of 6.27° ± 5.32° on the sagittal axis (pitch), while median angular errors are 3.72° on the axial axis (yaw) and 4.08° on the sagittal axis (pitch).
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience seems to support that simulation-guided navigation for vector control in mandibular distraction osteogenesis could be a useful procedure for reproducing the virtually planned outcome. Nevertheless, our results cannot be considered completely satisfactory. There is a lot of room to improve accuracy and errors seem to depend mainly on the soft tissues interference during distractor placement.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated seven patients affected by unilateral (3 pts.) or bilateral (4 pts.) mandibular hypoplasia and treated with this method between 2012 and 2014 at the Maxillofacial Surgery Unit of the University of Bologna, Italy. All patients were enrolled for mandibular distraction using internal unidirectional devices (11 distraction devices implanted overall). Patients were studied through a complete three-dimensional workflow, which led to obtaining a virtual reconstruction of the facial bones and the simulation of the distraction device positioning using a specific experimental software. The surgical planning was loaded on the navigation system and the distraction device was placed following the virtual plan, which is displayed on the navigation system as a guide and tracked with the navigation instruments.
RESULTS: We analyzed the outcome comparing the recorded three-dimensional coordinates of the achieved distractor position and the three-dimensional coordinates of the planned distractor position. Among the eleven placed distractors, we found a mean angular error of 3.74° ± 3.30° on the axial axis (yaw) and of 6.27° ± 5.32° on the sagittal axis (pitch), while median angular errors are 3.72° on the axial axis (yaw) and 4.08° on the sagittal axis (pitch).
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary experience seems to support that simulation-guided navigation for vector control in mandibular distraction osteogenesis could be a useful procedure for reproducing the virtually planned outcome. Nevertheless, our results cannot be considered completely satisfactory. There is a lot of room to improve accuracy and errors seem to depend mainly on the soft tissues interference during distractor placement.