Strategic management of the minor-form and microform cleft lip: A long-term outcome assessment.

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of the lesser form cleft lip deformity (i.e., minor-form, microform, and mini-microform) is challenging to achieve patient satisfaction. There are no studies investigating how treatment outcomes balance patients' expectations and satisfaction with surgical or non-surgical care relative to the initial nasolabial findings.

METHODS

Based on Mulliken's classification, consecutive records of patients with the lesser-form cleft lip from 1990 to 2015 were selected for analysis. Demographics, management, and revisions were reviewed. A panel analysis was performed based on the ratings from both professionals and non-professionals using patients' photographs. FACE-Q questionnaires were used to compare patient/parent-reported satisfaction to the normal controls.

RESULTS

A total of 135 patients were included. All of the minor-form (23/23), 89% (58/65) of the microform, and 62% (29/47) of the mini-microform patients underwent surgery. Fifty-two percent (15/29) of the mini-microform patients, who underwent surgery, showed no significant improvement. Post-operative upper lip scars and remaining nasal asymmetry were the most common concerns in the treatment group. However, the FACE-Q results showed that patients experienced a statistically significant improvement in their overall facial appearance and social function in their respective groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that differences exist in the perception of facial esthetics between the surgeon and the patient/parent. To achieve optimal individual treatment outcome and patient satisfaction, an awareness of the differences and treatment selection for patients are critical in surgical planning. This understanding and an open detailed discussion of overall long-term outcomes help in the management of patient expectations.