MedElevator
Войти в исследования BMC nephrology · 2019
Typing of hereditary renal amyloidosis presenting with isolated glomerular amyloid deposition.
Клинический случайСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Li Danyang, Liu Dan, Xu Hui, Yu Xiao-Juan, Zhou Fu-de, Zhao Ming-Hui, Wang Su-Xia
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: The commonly used methods for amyloid typing include immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry (IHC), which sometimes may come with diagnostic pitfalls. Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics has been recognized as a reliable technique in amyloid typing.
CASE PRESENTATION: We reported two middle-aged patients who presented with proteinuria, hypertension and normal renal function, and both had a family history of renal diseases. The renal biopsies of both patients revealed renal amyloidosis with the similar pattern by massive exclusively glomerular amyloid deposition. The IHC was performed by using a panel of antibodies against the common types of systemic amyloidosis, and demonstrated co-deposition of fibrinogen Aα chain and apolipoprotein A-I in the glomerular amyloid deposits of each patient. Then the MS on amyloid deposits captured by laser microdissection (LMD/MS) and genetic study of gene mutations were investigated. The large spectra corresponding to ApoA-I in case 1, and fibrinogen Aα chain in case 2 were identified by LMD/MS respectively. Further analysis of genomic DNA mutations demonstrated a heterozygous mutation of p. Trp74Arg in ApoA-I in case 1, and a heterozygous mutation of p. Arg547GlyfsTer21 in fibrinogen Aα chain in case 2.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study revealed that IHC was not reliable for accurate amyloid typing, and that MS-based proteomics and genetic analysis were essential for typing of hereditary amyloidosis.
CASE PRESENTATION: We reported two middle-aged patients who presented with proteinuria, hypertension and normal renal function, and both had a family history of renal diseases. The renal biopsies of both patients revealed renal amyloidosis with the similar pattern by massive exclusively glomerular amyloid deposition. The IHC was performed by using a panel of antibodies against the common types of systemic amyloidosis, and demonstrated co-deposition of fibrinogen Aα chain and apolipoprotein A-I in the glomerular amyloid deposits of each patient. Then the MS on amyloid deposits captured by laser microdissection (LMD/MS) and genetic study of gene mutations were investigated. The large spectra corresponding to ApoA-I in case 1, and fibrinogen Aα chain in case 2 were identified by LMD/MS respectively. Further analysis of genomic DNA mutations demonstrated a heterozygous mutation of p. Trp74Arg in ApoA-I in case 1, and a heterozygous mutation of p. Arg547GlyfsTer21 in fibrinogen Aα chain in case 2.
CONCLUSIONS: The current study revealed that IHC was not reliable for accurate amyloid typing, and that MS-based proteomics and genetic analysis were essential for typing of hereditary amyloidosis.