Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
An Evaluation of Dose-Related HPV Vaccine Effectiveness Using Central Registries in Michigan.
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка службы здравоохранения СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Gargano Julia W, You Mei, Potter Rachel, Alverson Georgetta, Swanson Robert, Saraiya Mona, Markowitz Lauri E, Copeland Glenn
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine effectiveness (VE) evaluations provide important information for vaccination programs. We established a linkage between statewide central registries in Michigan to estimate HPV VE against in situ and invasive cervical lesions (CIN3+).
METHODS: We linked females in Michigan's immunization and cancer registries using birth records to establish a cohort of 773,193 women with known vaccination history, of whom 3,838 were diagnosed with CIN3+. Residential address histories from a stratified random sample were used to establish a subcohort of 1,374 women without CIN3+ and 2,900 with CIN3+ among continuous Michigan residents. VE and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using cohort and case-cohort methods for up-to-date (UTD) vaccination and incomplete vaccination with 1 and 2 doses, and stratified by age at vaccination.
RESULTS: Both analytic approaches demonstrated lower CIN3+ risk with UTD and non-UTD vaccination vs. no vaccination. The cohort analysis yielded VE estimates of 66% (95% CI, 60%-71%) for UTD, 33% (95% CI, 18%-46%) for 2 doses-not UTD, and 40% (95% CI, 27%-50%) for 1 dose. The case-cohort analysis yielded VE estimates of 72% (95% CI, 64%-79%) for UTD, 39% (95% CI, 10%-58%) for 2 doses-not UTD, and 48% (95% CI, 25%-63%) for 1 dose. VE was higher for vaccination at age <20 than ≥20 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The statewide registry linkage found significant VE against CIN3+ with incomplete HPV vaccination, and an even higher VE with UTD vaccination.
IMPACT: Future VE evaluations by number of doses for women vaccinated at younger ages may further clarify dose-related effectiveness.
METHODS: We linked females in Michigan's immunization and cancer registries using birth records to establish a cohort of 773,193 women with known vaccination history, of whom 3,838 were diagnosed with CIN3+. Residential address histories from a stratified random sample were used to establish a subcohort of 1,374 women without CIN3+ and 2,900 with CIN3+ among continuous Michigan residents. VE and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using cohort and case-cohort methods for up-to-date (UTD) vaccination and incomplete vaccination with 1 and 2 doses, and stratified by age at vaccination.
RESULTS: Both analytic approaches demonstrated lower CIN3+ risk with UTD and non-UTD vaccination vs. no vaccination. The cohort analysis yielded VE estimates of 66% (95% CI, 60%-71%) for UTD, 33% (95% CI, 18%-46%) for 2 doses-not UTD, and 40% (95% CI, 27%-50%) for 1 dose. The case-cohort analysis yielded VE estimates of 72% (95% CI, 64%-79%) for UTD, 39% (95% CI, 10%-58%) for 2 doses-not UTD, and 48% (95% CI, 25%-63%) for 1 dose. VE was higher for vaccination at age <20 than ≥20 years.
CONCLUSIONS: The statewide registry linkage found significant VE against CIN3+ with incomplete HPV vaccination, and an even higher VE with UTD vaccination.
IMPACT: Future VE evaluations by number of doses for women vaccinated at younger ages may further clarify dose-related effectiveness.