Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2011
Comparison of two surgical methods (Winograd and sleeve method) in the treatment of ingrown toenail.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peyvandi Hassan, Robati Reza Mahmoud, Yegane Rooh-Allah, Hajinasrollah Esmaeil, Toossi Parviz, Peyvandi Ali-Asghar, Ourang Zahra-Beigom, Shams Amir
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Ingrowing toenail is one of the most common nail complaints. Although many surgical treatments are described for complicated nails, frequent recurrence of pain and postoperative disability necessitate finding an appropriate treatment.
METHODS: In a clinical trial, we compared the Winograd and sleeve (gutter) surgical methods to find a simple, painless, and practical alternative.
RESULTS: Of 100 patients (mean 27.8) included in the study, 50 underwent Winograd surgery and the rest the sleeve method. Postoperative infection occurred in four (8%) patients in the sleeve and three (6%) in the Winograd group. The condition reoccurred in five (10%) patients who underwent sleeve surgery and six (12%) who underwent Winograd. Recurrence rate was higher in female patients, although the difference was not statistically significant. Mean surgery duration for Winograd and sleeve methods was 15.7 minutes and 9.4 minutes, respectively, and postoperative work day loss was 2.0 weeks and 1.1 weeks, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The sleeve method seems to be more practical and appropriate for patients planning to go back to work sooner and better fulfills the main characteristics for the primary treatment of choice. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.
METHODS: In a clinical trial, we compared the Winograd and sleeve (gutter) surgical methods to find a simple, painless, and practical alternative.
RESULTS: Of 100 patients (mean 27.8) included in the study, 50 underwent Winograd surgery and the rest the sleeve method. Postoperative infection occurred in four (8%) patients in the sleeve and three (6%) in the Winograd group. The condition reoccurred in five (10%) patients who underwent sleeve surgery and six (12%) who underwent Winograd. Recurrence rate was higher in female patients, although the difference was not statistically significant. Mean surgery duration for Winograd and sleeve methods was 15.7 minutes and 9.4 minutes, respectively, and postoperative work day loss was 2.0 weeks and 1.1 weeks, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The sleeve method seems to be more practical and appropriate for patients planning to go back to work sooner and better fulfills the main characteristics for the primary treatment of choice. The authors have indicated no significant interest with commercial supporters.