MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1002/aorn.14349

Медицинская библиотека · AORN journal · 2025

A Nonrandomized Comparative Study of the Warming Effects of Conductive-Polymer Heating Devices in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery With Spinal Anesthesia.

Hagiwara Haruka, Tachibana Reika, Kumashiro Ryosuke, Ichihara Kodai, Yamaguchi Michiko, Hara Kentaro

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Maintaining normothermia during surgery is crucial to prevent perioperative hypothermia. This nonrandomized study of 70 patients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia compared the effectiveness of conductive-polymer heating devices (CPHDs) in maintaining temperatures and enhancing thermal comfort. Core and peripheral temperatures were recorded, and thermal comfort was assessed. Patients who were warmed with a CPHD blanket and those warmed with a CPHD blanket and a CPHD mattress reported significantly higher thermal comfort and had higher core temperatures (P < .01) than those warmed only by a CPHD mattress. Further, higher peripheral temperatures were achieved in patients warmed with a CPHD blanket or with both a CPHD mattress and a CPHD blanket when compared to those warmed by a CPHD mattress alone (P = .03). Blankets and combination warming methods are more effective than mattresses in maintaining temperatures and enhancing thermal comfort in patients undergoing cesarean delivery with spinal anesthesia.

Для цитирования: Hagiwara Haruka, Tachibana Reika, Kumashiro Ryosuke, Ichihara Kodai, Yamaguchi Michiko, Hara Kentaro. A Nonrandomized Comparative Study of the Warming Effects of Conductive-Polymer Heating Devices in Patients Undergoing Cesarean Delivery With Spinal Anesthesia.. AORN journal. 2025. DOI: 10.1002/aorn.14349.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.