MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5664/jcsm.10194

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2022

A single-arm, open-label, multicenter, and comparative study of the ANNE sleep system vs polysomnography to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea.

Davies Charles, Lee Jong Yoon, Walter Jessica, Kim Donghyun, Yu Lian, Park Junbin, Blake Stefanida, Kalluri Lakshmi, Cziraky Mark, Stanek Eric, Miller Julie, Harty Brian J, Schauer Jacob, Rangel Stephanie M, Serao Alexa, Edel Claire, Ran Davina S, Olagbenro Matthew O, Lim Andrew, Gill Kuljeet, Cooksey Jessica, Toloui Omid, Power Thomas, Xu Shuai, Zee Phyllis

Многоцентровое исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

STUDY

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate per-patient diagnostic performance of a wireless dual-sensor system (ANNE sleep) compared with reference standard polysomnography (PSG) for the diagnosis of moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) with a minimum prespecified threshold of 80% for both sensitivity and specificity.

METHODS

A multicenter clinical trial was conducted to evaluate ANNE sleep vs PSG to diagnose moderate and severe OSA in individuals 22 years or older. For each testing approach, apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was manually scored and averaged by 3 registered sleep technologists blinded to the other system. Average variations > 15% were adjudicated by a sleep medicine physician.

RESULTS

In a total of n = 225 participants (mean age 53 years, range 22-88 years), PSG diagnosed 30% (n = 68) of participants with moderate or severe OSA (AHI ≥ 15 events/h) compared to 29% (n = 65) diagnosed by ANNE sleep (P = .55). The sensitivity and specificity for ANNE sleep were 90% (95% confidence interval: 80-96%) and 98% (95% confidence interval: 94-99%), respectively. Strong correlation was shown in terms of final AHI (r = .93), with an average AHI bias of 0.5 (95% limits of agreement: -12.8 to 11.8). The majority of users noted comfort with using the ANNE sleep in the home setting. No adverse events were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Using PSG as the gold standard, ANNE sleep demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of moderate or severe OSA.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Comparative Study of the ANNE™ One System to Diagnose Obstructive Sleep Apnea; URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04643782; Identifier: NCT04643782.

CITATION: Davies C, Lee JY, Walter J et al. A single-arm, open-label, multicenter, and comparative study of the ANNE sleep system vs polysomnography to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(12):2703-2712.

Для цитирования: Davies Charles, Lee Jong Yoon, Walter Jessica, Kim Donghyun, Yu Lian, Park Junbin, Blake Stefanida, Kalluri Lakshmi, Cziraky Mark, Stanek Eric, Miller Julie, Harty Brian J, Schauer Jacob, Rangel Stephanie M, Serao Alexa, Edel Claire, Ran Davina S, Olagbenro Matthew O, Lim Andrew, Gill Kuljeet, Cooksey Jessica, Toloui Omid, Power Thomas, Xu Shuai, Zee Phyllis. A single-arm, open-label, multicenter, and comparative study of the ANNE sleep system vs polysomnography to diagnose obstructive sleep apnea.. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.5664/jcsm.10194.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.