MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4111/icu.20200076

Медицинская библиотека · Investigative and clinical urology · 2020

Learning curve of various type of male urethroplasty.

Choi Joongwon, Lee Chung Un, Sung Hyun Hwan

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

PURPOSE: To determine the number of cases required to achieve a specified recurrence-free rate (>80%) among urethroplasty types.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients, who underwent urethroplasty performed by a single surgeon between April 2013 and January 2019, was conducted. Urethroplasty subtypes were divided according to stricture location: penile, bulbar, and posterior. If there was no recurrence for >6 months after surgery, the surgery was considered to be a success. The average success rates among quintile groups were compared to determine the learning curve for each type.

RESULTS

Of 150 patients who underwent urethroplasty, 112 were included in this study. The overall success rate was 89.7% in penile, 97.8% in bulbar, and 74.1% in posterior urethroplasty. Bulbar urethroplasty reached the target success rate in the first quintile group (1-9 cases). Penile urethroplasty also achieved the target success rate in the first quintile group (1-8 cases), and the success rate gradually increased until the fifth quintile group (32-39 cases). In posterior urethroplasty, the target success rate was achieved in the fifth quintile group (20-27 cases).

CONCLUSIONS

Bulbar urethroplasty had the fastest learning curve, and posterior urethroplasty the slowest.

Для цитирования: Choi Joongwon, Lee Chung Un, Sung Hyun Hwan. Learning curve of various type of male urethroplasty.. Investigative and clinical urology. 2020. DOI: 10.4111/icu.20200076.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.