Mobility aids for children with high-level myelomeningocele: parapodium versus wheelchair.

The optimal method for providing mobility for children with myelomeningocele remains controversial. 39 children using a parapodium were compared with 29 children in wheelchairs. There were no significant differences between the two groups for medical complications, use of health-care services or activities of daily living, although there were differences in the patterns of complications. Children using the parapodium were more likely to develop lesions of the lower extremities, to have dislocated hips, to be more obese and to watch more television; children using wheelchairs were more likely to develop lesions of the gluteal region, to have knee-flexion contractures and to have fewer fecal accidents. The parapodium was judged by families to be less effective as a mobility aid; however, the upright posture it allows was considered extremely advantageous. A combined approach allowing upright posture and wheeled mobility would appear to be optimal.