MedElevator
Войти в исследования Seizure · 2024
Stereo-electroencephalography-guided radiofrequency thermocoagulation restricted to periventricular nodular heterotopias in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy: A single center experience.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Slegers Rutger, Wagner Louis, van Kuijk Sander, Hilkman Danny, Hofman Paul, van Hoof Raf, Jansen Jacobus, van Kranen-Mastenbroek Vivianne, Rijkers Kim, Tousseyn Simon, Colon Albert, Schijns Olaf, ACE epilepsy surgery group
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Periventricular nodular heterotopias (PVNH) are developmental abnormalities with neurons abnormally clustered around the cerebral ventricles. Patients frequently present with focal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). However, the relationship between PVNH and the seizure onset zone (SOZ) is complex. Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is an invasive diagnostic procedure for patients with DRE. In selected patients, the SEEG may be converted into a therapeutic procedure, lesioning the probable (SOZ) with pulsed radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFTC). The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SEEG-RFTC in a series of DRE patients with PVNH.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients with focal DRE related to PVNH and treated with SEEG-guided-RFTC restricted to nodules were prospectively collected between 2016 and 2023 and retrospectively analyzed after a follow-up of at least 12 months.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients (71 %) responded (ILAE class 1-4) after SEEG-guided RFTC of whom eleven (46 %) became seizure-free (class 1) at last follow up, nine (45 %) despite residual PVNH tissue on MRI. SEEG seizure onset was restricted to PVNH in eleven patients (class 1 in 45 %) and simultaneously in PVNH and other cortical areas in thirteen patients (class 1 in 46 %). Out of 31 SEEG-RFTC procedures in twenty-four patients, adverse events, related to RFTC, were recorded in eight (26 %), of which two patients (8 %) had predicted permanent visual complaints whilst the other five had transient complaints.
SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that a considerable percentage of patients, even with bilateral, multiple PVNH and involvement of adjacent cortical regions can be rendered seizure-free with SEEG-guided-RFTC restricted to the nodules. Furthermore, this study delivers evidence that the complete destruction of the entire nodule is not necessary to render a patient seizure free. This justifies the use of SEEG in patients with single, multiple or bilateral PVNHs to provide insight into the epileptogenic organization in and around these lesions.
METHODS: Twenty-four patients with focal DRE related to PVNH and treated with SEEG-guided-RFTC restricted to nodules were prospectively collected between 2016 and 2023 and retrospectively analyzed after a follow-up of at least 12 months.
RESULTS: Seventeen patients (71 %) responded (ILAE class 1-4) after SEEG-guided RFTC of whom eleven (46 %) became seizure-free (class 1) at last follow up, nine (45 %) despite residual PVNH tissue on MRI. SEEG seizure onset was restricted to PVNH in eleven patients (class 1 in 45 %) and simultaneously in PVNH and other cortical areas in thirteen patients (class 1 in 46 %). Out of 31 SEEG-RFTC procedures in twenty-four patients, adverse events, related to RFTC, were recorded in eight (26 %), of which two patients (8 %) had predicted permanent visual complaints whilst the other five had transient complaints.
SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that a considerable percentage of patients, even with bilateral, multiple PVNH and involvement of adjacent cortical regions can be rendered seizure-free with SEEG-guided-RFTC restricted to the nodules. Furthermore, this study delivers evidence that the complete destruction of the entire nodule is not necessary to render a patient seizure free. This justifies the use of SEEG in patients with single, multiple or bilateral PVNHs to provide insight into the epileptogenic organization in and around these lesions.